Abortion is already legal in New York, with some of the most far-reaching protections in the country. There is no need to add it to the constitution. Existing Abortion Laws in New York: Comprehensive Abortion Protections: New York State's Reproductive Health Act, passed in 2019, provides robust protections for abortion. It allows abortion at any stage to protect the woman’s life or health, making it one of the most permissive laws in the nation. No Constitutional Necessity: Given these protections, adding abortion rights to the state constitution is redundant. The laws already ensure comprehensive access and protection for abortion services. Political Strategy Behind Prop One: Fear Mongering: Prop One has been added to the ballot by politicians as a tactic to instill fear and urgency among voters, even though current laws already safeguard abortion rights. Distraction from Real Issues: This move serves to divert attention from significant issues and legislative measures that could impact parental rights, children's safety, and family autonomy. Protecting Family Rights and Priorities: Focus on Parental Rights: The Coalition to Protect Kids-NY emphasizes the need to prioritize parental rights and family autonomy over redundant legislative measures. Vote NO for Real Change: By voting NO on Prop One, New Yorkers can reject unnecessary constitutional amendments and focus on protecting essential family and parental rights. The Coalition advocates for real solutions that address the actual needs and rights of families.

Yes, many of these protections are indeed already established under New York State law. Here is a short list of relevant laws and policies that provide extensive protections: New York City and State Human Rights Laws New York City Human Rights Law: Applies to all individuals and provides comprehensive protection against discrimination. New York State Human Rights Law: Applies to persons 18 years of age or older, offering broad anti-discrimination measures. State and Federal Anti-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity Policies: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 (Section 1981): Ensures all individuals have equal rights under the law. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Protects individuals with disabilities against discrimination. The Rehabilitation Act of 1973: Prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in programs conducted by federal agencies. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA): Protects individuals 40 years of age and older from age-based employment discrimination. The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA): Amends the ADEA to prohibit age discrimination in employee benefits. The Equal Pay Act: Mandates equal pay for equal work regardless of gender. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act: Extends the time period for filing pay discrimination claims. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA): Prohibits employment discrimination based on national origin or citizenship status. Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA): Entitles eligible employees to take unpaid, job-protected leave for family and medical reasons. New York Consolidated Laws, Executive Law - EXC §: NY Executive Law 187: Provides additional protections and stipulations regarding anti-discrimination and equal rights. The existing framework already ensures a high standard of protection against discrimination and upholds equal rights for all individuals. The so-called Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), or the Parent Replacement Act, is unnecessary and poses significant risks. It opens the door to government overreach and undermines parental rights by allowing courts to make critical decisions regarding children without parental consent. Our stance is clear: We must safeguard the rights and protections currently in place and prevent any legislation that threatens to strip away these fundamental rights. Join us in opposing the ERA to ensure our children’s safety and preserve parental authority. Visit ProtectKidsNY.com for more information and to support our cause.

Here's how you can help us stop the Parent Replacement Act from passing in New York: Join the Coalition to Protect Kids-NY: Sign up for one of our grassroot coalitions. Your involvement is crucial. Donate or Host a Fundraiser: Financial contributions are essential. Donate or host a fundraiser to support the cause. Volunteer: Get involved by making calls or knocking on doors to educate voters. Organize Events: Help organize educational events in your area using our print materials. Spread the Word: Encourage everyone you know to vote NO on Election Day, November 5, 2024. The Coalition to Protect Kids-NY needs your help to defeat the Parent Replacement Act. This amendment could make common sense protections unconstitutional, allowing the state more authority than parents over their children's medical decisions. Join us and make a difference today!

Prop One, or the Parent Replacement Act, is a proposed amendment to the New York State Constitution that aims to drastically expand protections to include sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, and reproductive healthcare rights, including for minors. This could severely undermine parental rights and common sense protections for children. Dramatic Overreach in Constitutional Protections: Potentially Harmful Implications: Prop One seeks to extend rights related to sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, and reproductive healthcare to minors without adequate parental involvement. Impact on Parental Authority: This expansion could lead to minors making significant life decisions without parental consent, eroding the crucial role parents play in their children's lives. Vague and Broad Language: Ambiguous Wording: The amendment’s language is dramatically vague, creating a wide scope for interpretation that can lead to unintended consequences. Legal and Social Implications: The lack of specificity could result in court decisions that strip away parents' rights and allow for government overreach into family matters. Potential Threats to Parental Rights: Pandora’s Box of Issues: The passage of Prop One could open a Pandora’s Box, leading to the erosion of parental rights and the dismantling of established protections for children. Erosion of Parental Authority: By empowering state intervention over parental guidance, this amendment poses a significant threat to the authority and rights of parents to make crucial decisions about their children's upbringing and welfare. Join Us to Protect Parental Rights Prop One threatens the foundational rights of parents in New York. To protect our families and ensure common sense protections remain intact, it is crucial to stand against this amendment.

The passage of the Parent Replacement Act in New York has left many residents puzzled and concerned. Here’s why it happened: Dysfunctional Politics in Albany: Albany's political environment is often characterized by hasty decisions and lack of thorough debate. This poorly written amendment is a result of such a rushed process, where politicians prioritized speed over quality. Lack of Consideration for Everyday New Yorkers: The amendment was pushed through without proper consideration of its far-reaching consequences on families and children. Elected officials failed to follow New York State Law that mandates a comprehensive review and discussion before passing significant legislation. One-Size-Fits-All Approach: The language of the amendment is broad and vague, applying a one-size-fits-all solution to complex issues. This has raised alarms about the potential for unintended negative impacts on parental rights and children’s safety. Consequences of the Amendment: If this amendment passes, it could make common sense protections unconstitutional, allowing the state more authority than parents over their children's medical decisions. This is a significant concern for many New Yorkers who value family autonomy and parental rights. The Coalition to Protect Kids-NY is actively working to inform the public about the dangers of this amendment and mobilize support to defeat it. We believe that decisions affecting children should be made by parents, not politicians or courts.

Yes, the legal ramifications discussed are indeed true. The so-called Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which we have dubbed the Parent Replacement Act, poses significant risks to parental rights and family autonomy. Here’s a detailed look at the potential impacts: Parental Rights: The ERA could empower courts to allow minors to undergo irreversible medical procedures, such as gender-transition surgeries, without parental consent. This effectively removes parents from crucial decision-making processes regarding their children's health and well-being. Children's Safety and Welfare: Laws currently in the NYS legislature, like S6103, which allows minors aged 14 and older to receive vaccines without parental knowledge or consent, and A6761, which permits minors to make their own medical decisions, highlight the types of policies that could be upheld if the ERA is passed​. Impact on Sports: The ERA could also mandate that schools allow biological males to compete in girls' sports, which undermines fair competition and safety for female athletes​. Vague and Broad Language: Critics argue that the ERA's vague language could lead to a broad range of unintended consequences, such as weakening statutory protections against elder abuse and statutory rape, as these could be construed as discriminatory based on age or gender identity​. Furthermore, if these poorly written one-size-fits-all additions pass, each of the common sense guard rails in our society could be deemed unconstitutional under state law. The New York State government could have more authority than parents in making medical decisions for their minor children.